tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5728814948530385321.post4207425257323246959..comments2018-03-27T14:36:23.084-06:00Comments on a CONS is an object which cares: Frameworks and the conjunction fallacyUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5728814948530385321.post-64318927282182535812009-04-17T03:19:00.000-06:002009-04-17T03:19:00.000-06:00I don't think I can agree to your opinion on frame...I don't think I can agree to your opinion on frameworks. What about frameworks like Ruby on Rails / Seaside? With these, I'm able to build fancy web (2.0 ;)) applications within just a few days of learning. I mean, you're probably right with the observation that often, frameworks require a lot of unnecessary "trivial" effort ("writing XML files"). But on the other hand, you also have to weigh it against the benefit you get from reuse.<br /><br />(It's years ago when I last programmed Javascript and I completely lost track of the browser development, yet I can build a web app with such a framework. How can this be a bad choice? I'd need weeks to learn all the expertise that this frameworks provides me for free.)<br /><br />However, good article. It always helps me to reflect on things like that, even if I don't completely agree. ;) *Subscription added*<br /><br />--GüntherAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com